The results are: Microsoft Dynamics AX (8.6) vs. SAP Business One (8.7) for total quality and functionality; Microsoft Dynamics AX (100%) vs. SAP Business One (98%) for user satisfaction rating. Analyze their strong and low points and find out which software is a better option for your company.

1. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Vs Ax

Because an ERP system is the vital backbone of the business, an organization needs a solution that provides the necessary functionality, is easy and convenient to use, and enables a competitive advantage. If a company’s ERP system isn’t meeting these goals, it’s time to look for one that will.Microsoft Dynamics 365 and SAP are two of the most commonly shortlisted, and ultimately selected, ERP platforms in market today. Today we release our comparison white paper of the two:.The white paper evaluates the two systems using the most commonly used ERP evaluation criteria as found by the Aberdeen Group. The top five criteria are: Functionality, Ease of Use, Total Cost of Ownership, Must Be An Integrated Suite, and Ease and Speed of Implementation.Download the white paper:.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Vs Ax

Hi,SAP B1 has some very interesting in-built workflow capabilities which can be deployed 'out of the box' and the only disadvantage of this is that your organizational processes and procedures needs to be adjusted to fit within the parameters of the solutions. As for Dynamics Nav, such capabilities are not available 'out of the box' and some customization (using BizTalk) would be required to deploy such control capabilities. However, in terms of analysis of management information, the 'Dimensions' concept of MsDynamics Nav are way better that many other software solutions that I have used.So, whether it is SaaS or any other approach, it basically depends of how much management flexibility is required and also the depth of reporting requirements that you require.

I still believe that the unique functional requirements of your organization should be the key factors determining the selected solution.SAP B1 is generally buggy and lacks deep functionality. The product is a mile long and an inch deep, which basically means that when looking at overview demos and reading the sales and marketing material from SAP about the application, it sounds like it does it all.

However, when you actually get into using the application and want to take it a step further, you will run into some trouble. I think that B1 is probably going away in the long term, and will be replaced by A1S, depending on the success of A1S of course. If it does not go away, it is more likely that it will become a pure small market product, competing with Dynamics SL (Salomon), Quickbooks Enterprise, and Microsoft Office Accounting. B1 is not for growing businesses or more complex businesses.Dynamics NAV works great in the apparel business, as we have mid market clients in this type of business that run NAV. Their solution is enhanced, as you do not run NAV straight out of the box. NAV was built for being flexed and enhanced in order to fit specific organizations processes. No other product that I have seen or worked with can be tailored to a specific business or industry as well and easily as NAV.

Note that the product does not need to be enhanced because it lacks functionality, as NAV is has very strong and rich functionality out of the box (much more the B1). NAV is flexed and enhanced in order to streamline and make a business process more efficient. The alternative (not enhancing the solution) is to live with how the 'out of the box' point application defined that all the world's organizations should hand5le that specific process in an 'industry standard' way.Reward points if found helpfull.Cheers,Siva.